Injectable Cabotegravir Evidence Gap Tracker
The Biomedical Prevention Implementation Collaborative (BioPIC) consists of more than 100 HIV prevention experts from 80 organisations and 20 countries and supports successful introduction of biomedical HIV prevention options, including injectable cabotegravir (CAB) for PrEP. BioPIC coordinates regular Think Tanks to identify priority CAB for PrEP evidence gaps and review evidence from implementation and modelling studies to track progress against addressing them.
Below is a summary of the latest insights on CAB for PrEP coming out of these studies, links to learn more, and information on where evidence is still needed, mapped against priority evidence gaps.
Jump to section on:
HIV Testing and Drug Resistance
What potential is there for increased drug resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSIs) due to the introduction of CAB for PrEP?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES In multiple HPTN 083/084 study participants, HIV acquisition during the pharmacokinetic tail did not result in INSTI resistance |
LEARN MORE Landovitz Raphael J., Donnell Deborah, Clement Meredith E., Hanscom Brett, Cottle Leslie, Coelho Lara, et al. Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Aug 11;385(7):595–608 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional data on HIV acquisition, including during the pharmacokinetic tail, as the initial number CAB for PrEP users who acquired HIV in the study was small |
Delany-Moretlwe S, Hughes JP, Bock P, Ouma SG, Hunidzarira P, Kalonji D, et al. Cabotegravir for the prevention of HIV-1 in women: results from HPTN 084, a phase 3, randomised clinical trial. The Lancet. 2022 May 7;399(10337):1779–89 | How to detect INSTI resistance in users who seroconvert during the pharmacokinetic tail phase | |
Viral escape at high CAB levels can lead to INSTI resistance, and if HIV is not detected quickly after a CAB for PrEP failure, INSTI resistance can develop | Optimal strategies to manage and treat current and former CAB users who have seroconverted; currently being investigated in the PICASSO study | |
Though modelling has shown that the rollout of CAB for PrEP could lead to an overall increase in INSTI resistance, it is also likely to lead to an overall decrease in HIV incidence and deaths | What can modelling tell us about the scale-up of CAB for PrEP? | Impact of CAB for PrEP on INSTI resistance in real-world settings |
What is appropriate HIV testing approach for people on CAB for PrEP?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are sufficient for use with CAB for PrEP initiation and continuation and in line with a public health approach to testing, and there are no known advantages to using fourth generation RDTs over third generation RDTs; RNA testing may not be feasible in many settings due to cost, lengthy turnaround times, and lack of regulatory approvals |
LEARN MORE Notes from: Coordinating Implementation Science for CAB for PrEP: HIV Testing, June 2024 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Whether HIV self-testing can be used for CAB for PrEP initiation and continuation (currently under review by WHO) |
CAB for PrEP will never be as cost effective as oral PrEP if RNA testing is required, and modelling suggests a limited impact of RNA testing on INSTI resistance related to use of CAB for PrEP | What can modelling tell us about the scale-up of CAB for PrEP? | How to manage costs of CAB for PrEP rollout in settings where RNA testing is required |
In the HPTN 083 Open Label Extension, RNA testing performed poorly for detecting HIV infection during CAB for PrEP injections, with performance better immediately prior to CAB for PrEP initiation; most isolated positive RNA test results while on CAB for PrEP were false positive results | Landovitz R. Performance characteristics of HIV RNA screening with long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the multicenter global HIV Prevention Trials Network 083 (HPTN 083) Study. In Munich, Germany; 2024 | How to manage false positives in contexts where RNA testing is required for CAB for PrEP continuation |
If an early HIV infection is not diagnosed before CAB for PrEP is started, CAB can make it challenging to diagnose later on | Eshleman SH. The LEVI Syndrome: Characteristics of early HIV infection with Cabotegravir for PrEP. In Seattle, WA, USA; 2023 | How to resolve discrepant results and diagnose HIV, particularly where there is a discrepancy between RNA testing and rapid testing-this is being evaluated in the HPTN 083/084 Open Label Extension (OLE) and tracked across implementation studies and early programmatic rollout |
Rapid tests can result in false negatives if administered too soon after HIV transmission | HIV Testing Overview | • The number of positive cases rapid testing for CAB for PrEP initiation and continuation is likely to miss-this is being evaluated under the CATALYST study
• Optimal strategies for providers to manage CAB for PrEP users they strongly suspect have acute HIV |
Rapid tests can result in false positives due to frequency of testing and factors like co-infections, pregnancy, and steroid use | Optimal strategies for providers to manage false positives |
Patterns of Use
What is the impact of CAB for PrEP on HIV incidence?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES Several models have found that introduction of CAB for PrEP would reduce HIV incidence, with the % reduction dependent on context, such as location, population, and uptake vs oral PrEP |
LEARN MORE What can modelling tell us about the scale-up of CAB for PrEP? |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Impact of CAB for PrEP on HIV incidence in real-world settings |
Modelling has shown CAB for PrEP could have a larger impact than oral PrEP with the same coverage, and that the impact is larger if rolled out to both men and women vs women only | Notes from: Linking Modellers with the Latest CAB for PrEP Implementation Science Evidence, March 2024 | Impact of CAB for PrEP vs oral PrEP rollout in real-world settings |
Is direct to injection CAB for PrEP without an oral lead-in safe, efficacious, and preferable to users?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES In CAB/Rilpivirine (RPV) for treatment, direct to injection CAB has shown similar safety and efficacy profiles as that with an oral lead-in, though it is associated with lower CAB concentrations in users with high body mass index |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional pharmacokinetics data on initiation of CAB for PrEP without an oral lead-in to understand generalisability of CAB/RPV for treatment findings—this is being evaluated in the HPTN 083/084 OLE |
In the countries that have begun the HPTN 083 OLE, 36% of participants have chosen the oral lead-in, while in HPTN 084 OLE, 15% have chosen the oral lead-in | Reasons for choosing the oral lead-in vs direct to injection |
What is the impact of “bridging”-a CAB for PrEP user temporarily using oral PrEP when CAB is not available-on HIV incidence or drug resistance?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES No evidence to date |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Impact of a CAB for PrEP user bridging with oral PrEP |
Which users prefer CAB vs oral PrEP and why?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES 96% of participants in the HPTN 083 OLE in the USA chose CAB for PrEP- though this is not necessarily generalisable as participants had joined the trial because they were interested in CAB; there is no specific subgroup driving this choice disparity; 70% who chose CAB cited a preference for injections to pills generally, with only 15% citing efficacy as the reason for their choice |
LEARN MORE Slides from: Bridging from the HPTN 083 and 084 Open Label Extensions to Implementation, March 2023 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED User preference outside the context of a CAB trial, and outside the USA |
• 78% of participants in the HPTN 084 OLE chose CAB for PrEP; those who chose oral PrEP noted fear of injection site pain, while those who chose CAB noted preference for a more discreet, convenient method; partners, family, and others were influential in decision making
• There were different patterns of choice of CAB vs oral PrEP at site level in HPTN 084, which could suggest multiple factors, including the influence of providers, users’ social networks, and their community, impacting choice; while this was not observed in HPTN 083, there were differences in choice of oral lead-in vs direct to injection at site level which may also have been provider or community influence |
Slides from: Bridging from the HPTN 083 and 084 Open Label Extensions to Implementation, March 2023 | Reasons for method preference in real world contexts, including influence of providers and community in user choice |
In the SEARCH study, participants in the study arm were offered a choice between oral PrEP, PEP, and CAB for PrEP and the option to switch during the study, vs a choice between oral PrEP and PEP in the standard of care (SoC) arm; PrEP coverage in the study arm was 70% vs 13% in the SoC arm, with 56% in the study arm selecting CAB for PrEP; 42% of those who chose CAB for PrEP were not on any prevention product in the prior month; 28% of participants used two different products during the study; the study arm ended with zero incidence of HIV vs 1.8% in the SoC arm | Webinar: Discussing Early Results from the SEARCH Dynamic Choice Study | How to effectively offer choice at scale |
What are the most meaningful indicators for patterns of use?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES A subset of the PrEP Choice Investigators group is looking into harmonising indicators around patterns of use; a proposed new indicator includes Person Years of PrEP dispensed (PYP), which uses the volume and type of PrEP prescribed and number of PrEP visits to estimate PrEP coverage; early evidence shows this information is feasible to collect from facility records |
LEARN MORE Webinar: You Get What You Measure: Why Monitoring for PrEP Choice Helps Tell Our Story |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Meaningful indicators on patterns of use; feasibility of collecting data for PYP at scale |
Is CAB still safe and efficacious if given every three months?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES Early data suggests some dose forgiveness in three month dosing in individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB), but not those assigned male at birth; however, some AFAB trial participants were found to have lower CAB concentrations at three months which may suggest lower efficacy so three month dosing is not recommended |
LEARN MORE Slides from: Bridging from the HPTN 083 and 084 Open Label Extensions to Implementation, March 2023 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Data do not support three month dosing, and further research is not recommended with this formulation of CAB; more data is required on population and individual differences in the pharmacokinetics of CAB and its predictors, including why some individuals assigned male at birth got infected despite on-time injections |
Safety, Acceptability, and Efficacy for Diverse Populations
Is CAB safe, acceptable, and efficacious for pregnant and lactating populations?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES CAB for PrEP is safe and well tolerated in pregnancy; while initial evidence suggests that CAB concentrations decrease throughout pregnancy, they remain above exposure targets, so dose modifications are unlikely to be required |
LEARN MORE Delany-Moretlwe S. Initial evaluation of injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) safety during pregnancy in the HPTN 084 open-label extension. In Munich, Germany 2024 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional analysis on whether a dose adjustment may be needed during pregnancy |
Is CAB safe, acceptable, and efficacious for people under 18 years old?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES CAB has been found to be safe and efficacious in individuals over 35 kg, regardless of age.The HPTN 084-01 sub study found that CAB was safe and tolerable in cisgender women under 18, with 100% adherence to injection visits; 94% chose CAB in the OLE phase. |
LEARN MORE CAB LA for HIV Prevention in African Cisgender Female Adolescents |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional data on use of CAB in people of all genders under the age of 18. |
Is CAB safe, acceptable, and efficacious for gender diverse populations?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES HPTN 083 demonstrated that CAB is safe and effective for trans women. |
LEARN MORE Landovitz Raphael J., Donnell Deborah, Clement Meredith E., Hanscom Brett, Cottle Leslie, Coelho Lara, et al. Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Aug 11;385(7):595–608 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Data on use of CAB by trans men and non binary individuals. |
Initial findings suggest feminising gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) does not impact CAB concentration. | Slides from: Bridging from the HPTN 083 and 084 Open Label Extensions to Implementation, March 2023 | Data on impact of CAB on feminising GAHT and data on interactions between CAB and masculinising GAHT. |
Is CAB safe, acceptable, and efficacious for people who inject drugs?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES HPTN 083 and 084 did not include individuals who reported injection drug use in the past 90 days, though on-study injection behaviour did not lead to discontinuation. |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Data on use of CAB by people who inject drugs |
Is CAB safe, acceptable, and efficacious for sex workers?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES 40% of participants in HPTN 084 reported transactional sex in the one month prior to enrolment; 20% of participants in the qualitative sub-study self identified as sex workers and noted they liked the discretion provided by CAB. |
LEARN MORE Slides from: Bridging from the HPTN 083 and 084 Open Label Extensions to Implementation, March 2023 |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional data on use of CAB by sex workers to answer questions on implementation and generate additional evidence on uptake and acceptability. |
Service Delivery Models
Where and how can providers deliver choice and acceptable services?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES The SEARCH study effectively offered choice of CAB for PrEP, oral PrEP, and PEP across three settings: outpatient facilities, antenatal clinics, and community health workers going door-to-door. |
LEARN MORE Webinar: Discussing Early Results from the SEARCH Dynamic Choice Study |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional data on CAB delivery via a variety of service delivery models. |
What are optimal strategies for liver function testing (LFT)?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES Participants in HPTN 083/084 were screened for abnormal levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) at each visit, with 2.1% in HPTN 083 and less than 1% in HPTN 084 discontinuing due to concerns around liver function; these rates were the same in each arm of their respective studies and similar to what has been found in oral PrEP trials. Participants who contracted Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) during the trials were not automatically discontinued though most had to discontinue due to LFT results. |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional data to confirm the liver safety of CAB for PrEP and whether there are any groups that may require monitoring, such as those with HCV or heavy alcohol use. |
What are the optimal strategies for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES Participants in HPTN 083/084 were screened for syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhoea (both studies) and trichomonas (084 only) at the start of the trials and OLEs and every 24 weeks thereafter; symptoms or an exposure could also trigger testing at any time. The WHO issued guidance in September 2022 on optimal screening algorithms for PrEP programmes. |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED WHO's Implementation tool for pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV infection - Integrating STI services |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Additional data to inform strategies to increase access to laboratory-based STI testing. |
STI rates were not higher in the CAB arms of HPTN 083 and 084, though in general HPTN 084 found very high STI rates amongst AFAB participants. | Optimal strategies to address high rates of STIs within PrEP programmes. |
Costing
How much does CAB for PrEP cost to deliver?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES This evidence is being collected across multiple implementation science studies but is not yet available. |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Data on cost of CAB delivery via a variety of service delivery models. |
At what price is CAB for PrEP cost effective?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES Cost-effectiveness studies using evidence from HPTN 083 and 084 suggest that CAB for PrEP can be cost-effective, particularly if priced at one to two times the costs of oral PrEP. |
LEARN MORE What can modelling tell us about the scale-up of CAB for PrEP? |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Data on cost effectiveness of CAB delivery via a variety of service delivery models. |
To what degree does PrEP usage correspond to seasons of risk, and how can this information be collected?
EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MODELLING STUDIES The degree to which PrEP use corresponds with seasons of risk will have a significant impact on cost-effectiveness, though this requires following up with those who are no longer coming in for clinical care which is challenging. |
REMAINING GAPS TO BE ADDRESSED Optimal strategies to collect information on PrEP usage and seasons of risk. |